Categories

Review of the XC9572XL clone by Numato Lab

Posted on Monday, February 20th, 2012 in testing by DP

A few weeks ago Numato Lab ported our XC9572XL CPLD breakout board to KiCad. Hilipka got one of their assembled boards for free and wrote a review.

  • its quite a nice board, feeld of high quality
  • even included an oscillator
  • the JTAG header is not labeled at all, making it difficult in the beginning

I found one problem in common with the DP version: the Vcc pin of the JTAG header is connected directly to the on-board regulator, which might harm it (its not reverse battery protected). So currently one should not power the board that way, but always by 5 volts.

Get your own XC9572XL based CPLD dev board for $15 and start experimenting with programmable logic today.

Via the forum.

This entry was posted on Monday, February 20th, 2012 at 11:00 pm and is filed under testing. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

4 Responses to “Review of the XC9572XL clone by Numato Lab”

  1. Brent says:

    The funny thing is I see a semi tome stoned cap to the left of the processor… Someone should really check the quality of their boards before releasing product pictures like that.

  2. Hendrik Lipka says:

    Just for clarification: this picture has been taken by me, not by Numato Labs. And it is a prototype, not a finished product.

  3. Hendrik Lipka says:

    Just checked the board again – this cap is soldered properly. I verified two times with a jewelers loupe – it really is just a reflection making it look that way (I took a picture for the next posting).

  4. Brent says:

    Ohh well good job on the rest of the soldering :) I guess the flash got you on this one.

Leave a Reply

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.

Recent Comments

  • Pekka Akselin: This is ridiculous!? :-) We are back at 256(!) byte EPROMs that needed multiple, a handful, of voltages to run! :-(
  • KH: Let's try a back-of-envelope calc balancing energies. From MCP1700 datasheet, there are graphs for a 200mA load step. Estimate the energy shortfall as 12uJ. Say...
  • Daniel: It's been a week and my comment is still awaiting moderation. Apparently the CIA doesn't want their involvement known?
  • KH: Agree, so okay, I guess he must have learned from somewhere. 100nF and 1000uF is so far apart, that was jarring; it's more magic incantation...
  • Max: I have a suspicion the hefty electrolytic cap might be some sort of cargo cult carry-over from other RF-based projects - for instance, I've seen...