App note: Linear regulators reverse voltage protection

Posted on Sunday, December 31st, 2017 in app notes by DP


Various input and output reverse voltage protection method for linear regulators discussed in this app note from ROHM. Link here (PDF)

A linear regulator integrated circuit (IC) is a DC-to-DC buck converter system that reduces a DC supply from higher voltage level to a lower voltage level, thus it requires that the input voltage is always higher than the regulated voltage. Output voltage, however, may become higher than the input voltage under specific situations or circuit configurations, and that reverse voltage and current may cause damage to the IC. A reverse polarity connection or certain inductor components can also cause a polarity reversal between the input and output terminals. This application note provides instructions on reversed voltage polarity protection for ICs.

This entry was posted on Sunday, December 31st, 2017 at 1:00 pm and is filed under app notes. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

3 Responses to “App note: Linear regulators reverse voltage protection”

  1. Dave B says:

    DC to DC “Buck Converter”? That is Utter bolox!

    They are not switched mode systems,
    they are self regulating linear voltage dropping systems,
    that dissipate the unwanted energy as heat.
    Nothing SMPS related in any way, so *very* low noise,
    and with *very* good dynamic regulation.

    Correct and robust reverse I/O polarity protection takes
    a lot more than just a diode between input and output!

    Best read the most excellent National Semiconductor
    (and other) application and data books for these things.


  2. KH says:

    Shocking, ROHM must have got some rubbish new staff or intern to work on this. Watch out, onlines sellers in China are doing the same dumbass thing lately. I’ve corrected one vendor on this in the past month. Of course the Chinese vendor’s excuse was that they do not have the relevant tech knowledge, but I don’t think ROHM can give the same excuse.

    • KH says:

      Of course, for avoidance of ambiguity, I am following up on Dave noticing the “DC-to-DC buck converter”. So which ROHM staff thinks the FET there is a converter?

Leave a Reply

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.

Recent Comments

  • Drone: The LM7171 used in this very simple design can be simulated in LTspice with reasonable results at 10MHz using the non-encrypted PSPICE model from TI...
  • Jon Jackson: I would be interested in 1 or 2 of your circuit boards. Jon
  • Max: An actual Saturday "detector" built with the same hardware would use the precisely timed slightly varying length of the day (and some built-in astronomy data)...
  • KH: In the old days, these things remained on paper forever as whimsical scrawls. Today, they are brandished about on blogs for the entire world to...
  • KH: So he doesn't really know what he's doing. Yawn. It's sensor-controlled. It's not an oscillator. A leaf covers the window, you're toast. TLV3702? Overkill. The...