App note: Linear regulators reverse voltage protection

Posted on Sunday, December 31st, 2017 in app notes by DP


Various input and output reverse voltage protection method for linear regulators discussed in this app note from ROHM. Link here (PDF)

A linear regulator integrated circuit (IC) is a DC-to-DC buck converter system that reduces a DC supply from higher voltage level to a lower voltage level, thus it requires that the input voltage is always higher than the regulated voltage. Output voltage, however, may become higher than the input voltage under specific situations or circuit configurations, and that reverse voltage and current may cause damage to the IC. A reverse polarity connection or certain inductor components can also cause a polarity reversal between the input and output terminals. This application note provides instructions on reversed voltage polarity protection for ICs.

This entry was posted on Sunday, December 31st, 2017 at 1:00 pm and is filed under app notes. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

3 Responses to “App note: Linear regulators reverse voltage protection”

  1. Dave B says:

    DC to DC “Buck Converter”? That is Utter bolox!

    They are not switched mode systems,
    they are self regulating linear voltage dropping systems,
    that dissipate the unwanted energy as heat.
    Nothing SMPS related in any way, so *very* low noise,
    and with *very* good dynamic regulation.

    Correct and robust reverse I/O polarity protection takes
    a lot more than just a diode between input and output!

    Best read the most excellent National Semiconductor
    (and other) application and data books for these things.


  2. KH says:

    Shocking, ROHM must have got some rubbish new staff or intern to work on this. Watch out, onlines sellers in China are doing the same dumbass thing lately. I’ve corrected one vendor on this in the past month. Of course the Chinese vendor’s excuse was that they do not have the relevant tech knowledge, but I don’t think ROHM can give the same excuse.

    • KH says:

      Of course, for avoidance of ambiguity, I am following up on Dave noticing the “DC-to-DC buck converter”. So which ROHM staff thinks the FET there is a converter?

Leave a Reply to KH

Click here to cancel reply.

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.

Recent Comments

  • gant: They still have a couple of the more expensive (but still considerably cheap) 5S-I-S01 in stock...
  • readybrek: Anyone got a any recommendations for a budget-priced hot air station?
  • William: lol I'm happy to waste 3c for each program/debug cycle... but probably not the time spent soldering a new device down to a proto board!...
  • Joe Desbonnet: Ya, I can recommend the low melting point solder. I used brand 'ChipQuik' and it's amazingly easy to use.
  • Jerome: I need a new BusPirate for the Fablab ;) Many thanks!