Categories

App note: Driving MOSFET and IGBT switches using the Si828x

Posted on Sunday, August 13th, 2017 in app notes by DP

an_silabs_AN1009

App note from Silicon Labs on their MOSFET and IGBT driver Si828x and how to determining its external components to achieve optimized performance. Link here (PDF)

The Si828x products integrate isolation, gate drivers, fault detection protection, and operational indicators into one package to drive IGBTs and MOSFETs as well as other gated power switch devices. Most Si828x products (except the Si8286) have three separate output pins to provide independent rise and fall time settings and low impedance clamping to suppress Miller voltage spikes. This application note provides guidance for selecting the external components necessary for operation of the driver. Although this application note discusses the topic of driving IGBTs and MOSFETs, users can apply the same concepts for driving other gate-based power switches, such as SiC (Silicon Carbide).

This entry was posted on Sunday, August 13th, 2017 at 1:00 pm and is filed under app notes. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

Leave a Reply

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.

Recent Comments

  • Pekka Akselin: This is ridiculous!? :-) We are back at 256(!) byte EPROMs that needed multiple, a handful, of voltages to run! :-(
  • KH: Let's try a back-of-envelope calc balancing energies. From MCP1700 datasheet, there are graphs for a 200mA load step. Estimate the energy shortfall as 12uJ. Say...
  • Daniel: It's been a week and my comment is still awaiting moderation. Apparently the CIA doesn't want their involvement known?
  • KH: Agree, so okay, I guess he must have learned from somewhere. 100nF and 1000uF is so far apart, that was jarring; it's more magic incantation...
  • Max: I have a suspicion the hefty electrolytic cap might be some sort of cargo cult carry-over from other RF-based projects - for instance, I've seen...