PCB a Week 9: MrRef voltage and current reference update

Posted on Monday, June 24th, 2013 in PCBs by DP


Mats posted pictures of his MrRef voltage and current reference PCB build.  This tool helps check the accuracy of your multimeter:

Since my Agilent 34401 is currently out of calibration I didn’t bother installing the fine-adjustment trimopot. The 6350 is good for 0.02% (1mV) without any adjustments. But I installed two 10K 0.05% resistors on the board to get the 1mA output working.

The idea of using two cr1216 in each battery holder kinda works (I need >8 volts to run the chip so I have now four 3v cells in series), but the next revision of the board will use four separate battery holders. It’s too easy to short out the two positive poles of the batteries in the holder, I had to insulate them with kapton tape to get it working properly.

This entry was posted on Monday, June 24th, 2013 at 11:00 am and is filed under PCBs. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

5 Responses to “PCB a Week 9: MrRef voltage and current reference update”

  1. Oliver says:

    shut up and take my money!

    Really, I really like this idea. Having some ‘guaranteed’ reference to verify equipment against is awesome. A little more to ‘finish the edges’, like you said the battery holders etc. But if not too expensive (and it really shouldn’t be, as the only real costs are the chip) this should be available at seeed or the like.

  2. Drone says:

    This looks like it is missing one thing – a 0.1″ header and jumper to disconnect the batteries? After-all, you use a device like this infrequently and removing the batteries between uses will be a PTH. Of-course I may be missing something; I haven’t drilled down into the design (if-true, sorry for that).

    • Mats Engstrom (@matseng) says:

      There’s a nice smd slide switch just below the green led…. It turns the device on and off . :-)

      • Drone says:

        Aha! That is great. It should be a prominent feature IMHO. Thanks for the clarification.

  3. David says:

    I bought the DMMCHECK Plus, it does a lot more at:
    Heard about it from David L. Jones – EEVBlog

Leave a Reply

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.

Recent Comments

  • Drone: So these go for around $330 USD and NO published calibration procedure online or otherwise? Given what's inside - I don't think I'll be considering...
  • Pekka Akselin: This is ridiculous!? :-) We are back at 256(!) byte EPROMs that needed multiple, a handful, of voltages to run! :-(
  • KH: Let's try a back-of-envelope calc balancing energies. From MCP1700 datasheet, there are graphs for a 200mA load step. Estimate the energy shortfall as 12uJ. Say...
  • Daniel: It's been a week and my comment is still awaiting moderation. Apparently the CIA doesn't want their involvement known?
  • KH: Agree, so okay, I guess he must have learned from somewhere. 100nF and 1000uF is so far apart, that was jarring; it's more magic incantation...