chipKIT followup and interview with elektroniktidningen

Posted on Tuesday, September 6th, 2011 in interviews, PIC by Ian

Swedish publication elektroniktidningen did a short interview and writeup [machine translation] about our chipKIT editorial. Here’s the English Q&A from our emails:

Did you get any feedback from Microchip on this issue?

The other companies involved in chipKIT – the hardware designer, the software developer – left comments on the article. Nobody from Microchip has contacted us. Microchip is a huge company, and our contacts are all in the chipKIT group. They all pushed for the open source drivers too, it was other parts of the company that said no. We really support what the chipKIT group is trying to do, and hoped that writing about this raised awareness of the roadblocks they face. The part of Microchip pushing closed source stuff on chipKIT should know that their customers, and the community they’re marketing to, are aware of the issue and expect better.

The blog entry is from end of August, do you still stand behind it? Weighing in in the comments you received om your blog post – did that move your position? How would you state your position?

Despite getting lots of anti-Microchip comments, the editorial wasn’t too critical. It’s easy to stand behind. We don’t expect Microchip to make anything open source at all, most companies don’t! We’re disappointed that they didn’t follow through on their marketing hype and support chipKIT with open source software and drivers.

Google’s Swedish to English translation of “Microchip” is “Analog Devices” in this article.

This entry was posted on Tuesday, September 6th, 2011 at 2:56 pm and is filed under interviews, PIC. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

One Response to “chipKIT followup and interview with elektroniktidningen”

  1. Niklas Jansson says:

    Just wanted to say that the text seem to be correctly translated.

Leave a Reply

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.

Recent Comments

  • Stephen Tinius: Thank you.
  • KH: Ah, the site sells boards, that's the reason. At least it's a XC6SL9 board that does not cost an arm and a leg, though it...
  • Max: While I understand this is more educational than practical in nature, I prefer my edutainment a lot more firmly grounded in economic reality. Sure, you...
  • KH: Using an alkaline coin cell down to 1.0V or under is a very bad idea anyway, unless you as the designer or manufacturer don't care...
  • KH: Farnell says TS1001 is no longer stocked. Not on RS. Digikey says it's obsolete. That said, there are a lot of nanoamp-class parts on sale...