MIT unveils Android App Inventor2

Posted on Wednesday, December 18th, 2013 in Android, code, site by the machinegeek

The App Inventor group at MIT have unveiled App Inventor2. You may be familiar with the App Inventor project when it was previously featured. (At that time it was known as Google App Inventor.) Essentially it helps you build Android apps using a graphical interface which is useful for quick coding and debugging, and is especially helpful to new developers unfamiliar with coding.

Those familiar with the original app inventor will find a number of important changes including that App Inventor is now entirely in the browser. Previously to run App Inventor you needed to install and run a Java file called the Blocks Editor. Now, the Blocks Editor is just a different mode in your project that is viewed from the browser. Also all blocks are available on the left side. There is no longer a need to switch between Built-In, My Blocks, and Advanced drawers. The source code file is now a “.aia” file instead of a “.zip” file

For complete information on using App Inventor2 visit the project’s MIT homepage.

This entry was posted on Wednesday, December 18th, 2013 at 2:00 pm and is filed under Android, code, site. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

One Response to “MIT unveils Android App Inventor2”

  1. Cyk says:

    Only usable with a google account.
    No thanlks.

Leave a Reply

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.

Recent Comments

  • Drone: So these go for around $330 USD and NO published calibration procedure online or otherwise? Given what's inside - I don't think I'll be considering...
  • Pekka Akselin: This is ridiculous!? :-) We are back at 256(!) byte EPROMs that needed multiple, a handful, of voltages to run! :-(
  • KH: Let's try a back-of-envelope calc balancing energies. From MCP1700 datasheet, there are graphs for a 200mA load step. Estimate the energy shortfall as 12uJ. Say...
  • Daniel: It's been a week and my comment is still awaiting moderation. Apparently the CIA doesn't want their involvement known?
  • KH: Agree, so okay, I guess he must have learned from somewhere. 100nF and 1000uF is so far apart, that was jarring; it's more magic incantation...