Categories

Understanding and characterizing timing jitter

Posted on Thursday, February 7th, 2013 in documentation by the machinegeek

natlinstru

Matthew Zaleski found this resource posted by National Instruments. It’s a fairly detailed whitepaper titled “Understanding and Characterizing Timing Jitter”. This looks like a good resource for anyone doing high-frequency communications.

Via the contact form.

This entry was posted on Thursday, February 7th, 2013 at 3:00 pm and is filed under documentation. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

One Response to “Understanding and characterizing timing jitter”

  1. Drone says:

    Nice find Matthew. The app note publish is dated is 23 January 2013. There is a .pdf download on the page linked in the original post.

    However, there is really nothing in this application note that deals with Jitter vs. Phase Noise – which are equipollent (but not equivalent). – A deep subject. But one anyone dealing with timing and communications systems should understand the difference.

    Also, the document doesn’t really explain how jitter/phase-noise is affected by N times multiplication (worse) or division (better) – theoretically 20*log(N). A proper treatment of the multiply/divide factor should also include how non-ideal (and non-linear) devices doing the multiplication or division can add to the noise themselves. Again – a deep subject.

    But he NI note is worth a download IMO… Thanks

Leave a Reply

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.

Recent Comments

  • Pekka Akselin: This is ridiculous!? :-) We are back at 256(!) byte EPROMs that needed multiple, a handful, of voltages to run! :-(
  • KH: Let's try a back-of-envelope calc balancing energies. From MCP1700 datasheet, there are graphs for a 200mA load step. Estimate the energy shortfall as 12uJ. Say...
  • Daniel: It's been a week and my comment is still awaiting moderation. Apparently the CIA doesn't want their involvement known?
  • KH: Agree, so okay, I guess he must have learned from somewhere. 100nF and 1000uF is so far apart, that was jarring; it's more magic incantation...
  • Max: I have a suspicion the hefty electrolytic cap might be some sort of cargo cult carry-over from other RF-based projects - for instance, I've seen...