Categories

Understanding and characterizing timing jitter

Posted on Thursday, February 7th, 2013 in documentation by the machinegeek

natlinstru

Matthew Zaleski found this resource posted by National Instruments. It’s a fairly detailed whitepaper titled “Understanding and Characterizing Timing Jitter”. This looks like a good resource for anyone doing high-frequency communications.

Via the contact form.

This entry was posted on Thursday, February 7th, 2013 at 3:00 pm and is filed under documentation. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

One Response to “Understanding and characterizing timing jitter”

  1. Drone says:

    Nice find Matthew. The app note publish is dated is 23 January 2013. There is a .pdf download on the page linked in the original post.

    However, there is really nothing in this application note that deals with Jitter vs. Phase Noise – which are equipollent (but not equivalent). – A deep subject. But one anyone dealing with timing and communications systems should understand the difference.

    Also, the document doesn’t really explain how jitter/phase-noise is affected by N times multiplication (worse) or division (better) – theoretically 20*log(N). A proper treatment of the multiply/divide factor should also include how non-ideal (and non-linear) devices doing the multiplication or division can add to the noise themselves. Again – a deep subject.

    But he NI note is worth a download IMO… Thanks

Leave a Reply

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.

Recent Comments

  • Bob: Jambalaya rocks.
  • KH: I should point out something... well, lead acid car batteries are designed to be well-charged all the time. The plates (which are patterned and thin)...
  • David Haile: You are a smart person and absolutely correct. That kind of current needs a lead acid car battery behind it. Still, it does have its...
  • KH: The solution discussed in the linked article is wrong. It's a largish Lipo (2500mAh) and he thinks 77uA is acceptable... ha ha ha ha ha....
  • Dave: I never had to opportunity to learn or use this stuff when I was in college (I'm sooo old that op-amps were just being developed...