Categories

MS announces new Kinect for Windows hardware

Posted on Sunday, November 27th, 2011 in Development, News by the machinegeek


Microsoft has announced they will be making a special edition of the Kinect available designed especially for Windows hackers. The new Kinect will include optimized hardware components and firmware adjustments to better enable PC-centric scenarios. The unit will complement the Kinect for Windows SDK. MS reports:

Simple changes include shortening the USB cable to ensure reliability across a broad range of computers and the inclusion of a small dongle to improve coexistence with other USB peripherals. Of particular interest to developers will be the new firmware which enables the depth camera to see objects as close as 50 centimeters in front of the device without losing accuracy or precision, with graceful degradation down to 40 centimeters. “Near Mode” will enable a whole new class of “close up” applications, beyond the living room scenarios for Kinect for Xbox 360.

No pricing info was released. The device is anticipated in early 2012.

This entry was posted on Sunday, November 27th, 2011 at 4:09 am and is filed under Development, News. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

2 Responses to “MS announces new Kinect for Windows hardware”

  1. tayken says:

    Hmm, making a 3D scanner with Kinect can be a good project.

  2. JSmith says:

    First the Windows Phone 7, now the Kinect; good moves on Microsoft’s part to embrace hacking rather than crush it.

Leave a Reply

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.

Recent Comments

  • Edward Mallon: Like a great Hollywood franchise, I've finally put together the prequel - months after the I2C registers tutorial was released: https://edwardmallon.wordpress.com/2017/12/17/adding-sensors-to-an-arduino-data-logger/ This adds to the...
  • Drone: So these go for around $330 USD and NO published calibration procedure online or otherwise? Given what's inside - I don't think I'll be considering...
  • Pekka Akselin: This is ridiculous!? :-) We are back at 256(!) byte EPROMs that needed multiple, a handful, of voltages to run! :-(
  • KH: Let's try a back-of-envelope calc balancing energies. From MCP1700 datasheet, there are graphs for a 200mA load step. Estimate the energy shortfall as 12uJ. Say...
  • Daniel: It's been a week and my comment is still awaiting moderation. Apparently the CIA doesn't want their involvement known?