by erdabyz » Sat Sep 08, 2012 8:23 pm
You can get an efficiency estimation of a SMPS design with your method, but if you really really want to measure true efficiency you have to do something a little more complex. Basically SMPS efficiency is measured by setting load conditions, waiting for a steady state (ie. when the behaviour of the voltages and currents involved in the circuit are mostly periodic) and then integrating power in both input and output over several cycles of that periodic behaviour. If your multimeters are true RMS (which I suppose as they are flukes) and behave well at the frequencies involved in the SMPS design then the estimations should be fairly accurate.
Anyways, the efficiencies you report are quite low. I'm not sure about how MAX1771 works but MC34063 and NE555 designs should be straightforward PWM and with such a control method efficiency tends to be low at light loads. Probably MAX1771 incorporates some sort of "burst mode" behaviour, as does LT1073 for example, which dramatically improves light load efficiency.
You could also have some problems with the MOSFET behaviour. MC34063 (and likely NE555) designs use bipolar transistors and (at least MC34063 ones) drive the gate of the MOSFET from the emmiter of the output bipolar transistor of the controller, and rely on a "bleeding" resistor to drive the gate low. That's OK for low frequency switching, but at low frequencies the inductors need to be large. For example, my 6 tube nixie clock has a MC34063 based PSU design and it uses a fairly large 330uH inductor which gets slightly warm over time meaning that appreciable losses are occuring in there. Haven't measured efficiency. Maybe using a larger inductor and a mosfet with less gate capacitance helps.