There seems to be a lot of (conflicting) wishes for the pinstate command. I think making it usercontrollable is pointless (writing it down somewhere is simpler
) so I started the poll.
1. Ground is brown (the current one)
I2C> v
Pinstates:
(BR) (RD) (OR) (YW) (GN) (BL) (PU) (GR) (WT) (Blk)
GND 3.3V 5.0V ADC VPU AUX SCL SDA - -
P P P I I I I I I I
GND 0.00V 0.00V 0.00V 0.00V L L L L L
I2C>
2. Ground is black
I2C> v
Pinstates:
(Blk) (WT) (GR) (PU) (BL) (GN) (YW) (OR) (RD) (BR)
GND 3.3V 5.0V ADC VPU AUX SCL SDA - -
P P P I I I I I I I
GND 0.00V 0.00V 0.00V 0.00V L L L L L
I2C>
3. pinnumbers
(1) is the top left, (2) is the top right, .. , (10) is bottom right
I2C> v
Pinstates:
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)
GND 3.3V 5.0V ADC VPU AUX SCL SDA - -
P P P I I I I I I I
GND 0.00V 0.00V 0.00V 0.00V L L L L L
I2C>
4. pinnames (as printed on the silkscreen)
I2C> v
Pinstates:
GND 3.3V 5.0V ADC VPU AUX CLK MOSI CS MISO
GND 3.3V 5.0V ADC VPU AUX SCL SDA - -
P P P I I I I I I I
GND 0.00V 0.00V 0.00V 0.00V L L L L L
I2C>
I personally prefer the third option, since this it the most general one and would suit everyone (also the homebuilt cablesets).
Please take a look at the newterm topic for some extra thoughts regarding the colouring scheme. ( discussion starts here: http://dangerousprototypes.com/forum/in ... 44#msg4344 )
Edit: added pinnumberingplan