Urjtag 0.10 vs Urjtag svn November 10, 2012, 01:34:57 am I downloaded and builded the svn version of urjtag, and I found some significant changes related to Bus Blaster, which appear as a ft2232 cable. Related to this the source file ft2232.c in the 0.10 version has 61208 bytes and is from 2009-04-12, and in the svn version has 90305 bytes and is from 2012-09-19.They are many changes, like the new jtag executable in my case is only 6232 bytes vs the 0.10 jtag of 2153838 bytes, because the new is based on libraries (I must to execute before use it the first time ldconfig, to add to the system the new libraries)I must to install python-devel, Flex, gettext-tools, byacc, and creating a symlink with the name yacc pointing to byacc.http://urjtag.svn.sourceforge.net/viewv ... repositoryThe commands are:svn co http://urjtag.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/urjtag/trunk urjtagcd urjtag/jtag./autogen.sh# ./configure done by autogen.sh; run it here with special options if neededmakemake installBy runing the ./autogen.sh they was no need to invoque the ./configure, which has detected and enabled this:urjtag is now configured for Libraries: libusb : 1.0 libftdi : yes (no async mode) libftd2xx : yes inpout32 : no Subsystems: SVF : yes BSDL : yes STAPL : no Drivers: Bus : arm9tdmi au1500 avr32 bcm1250 blackfin bscoach ejtag ejtag_dma fjmem ixp425 ixp435 ixp465 jopcyc h7202 lh7a400 mpc5200 mpc824x mpc8313 mpc837x ppc405ep ppc440gx_ebc8 prototype pxa2x0 pxa27x s3c4510 sa1110 sh7727 sh7750r sh7751r sharc_21065L sharc_21369_ezkit slsup3 tx4925 zefant_xs3 Cable : arcom byteblaster dlc5 ea253 ei012 ft2232 gpio ice100 igloo jlink keithkoep lattice mpcbdm triton usbblaster vsllink wiggler xpc Lowlevel : direct ftdi ftd2xx ppdev Language bindings: python : yes Last Edit: January 01, 1970, 01:00:00 am by Guest
Re: Urjtag 0.10 vs Urjtag svn Reply #1 – February 07, 2013, 11:00:31 pm I just followed this guide (ubuntu 10.04) Edit: And Mint-14.1 x64 - today all ok.make & sudo make install went finebut on excecuting : jtag i got this errorjtag: error while loading shared libraries: liburjtag.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directoryThe library is installed in /usr/local/libls /usr/local/lib -l lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 18 2013-02-07 22:43 liburjtag.so.0 -> liburjtag.so.0.0.0And i have the libc.conf in my /etc/ld.so.conf.d dircontaining : cat libc.conf # libc default configuration/usr/local/libBut i apparently had to reload the cache via a : sudo ldconfigNow jtag starts ...And i'm only waiting for my (newly ordered) BBv2 :-(/Bingo Last Edit: January 01, 1970, 01:00:00 am by Guest
Re: Urjtag 0.10 vs Urjtag svn Reply #2 – February 15, 2013, 10:37:48 am I got my BB v2.5and tried Urjtagsudo jtagApparently it defaults to the ftd2xx driver witch i havent build against (non gpl)jtag> cable ft2232 interface=1error: Couldn't connect to suitable USB device.error: ftdi/ftd2xx error: ftdi_usb_open_desc() failed: device not foundSo use this command instead: jtag> cable ft2232 pid=0x6010 vid=0x403 interface=1Connected to libftdi driver.jtag> /Bingo Last Edit: January 01, 1970, 01:00:00 am by Guest