US DoD gives thumbs up to open source

In a boost to the open source software movement, the United States Department of Defense (DoD) issued a 68+ page report entitled Open Technology Development (OTD): Lessons Learned & Best Practices for Military Software, the DoD outlines the military’s experiences with and approval of open source software. From this paragraph on page 1 of the Introduction, it appears that the DoD writers actually get it:

Imagine if only the manufacturer of a rifle were allowed to clean, fix, modify or upgrade that rifle. The military often finds itself in this position with taxpayer funded, contractor developed software: one contractor with a monopoly on the knowledge of a military software system and control of the software source code. This is optimal only for the monopoly contractor, but creates inefficiencies and ineffectiveness for the government, reduction of opportunities for the industrial base, severely limits competition for new software upgrades, depletes resources that can be used to better effect and wastes taxpayer-provided funds.

The report outlines a framework with recommendations to assist government agencies in planning and utilizing OTD resources. One piece of sagacious advice found on report page 4 reads: “In general, it is important to simplify use, modification, and distribution. If it takes a team of lawyers to determine if there are adequate rights to modify a program, it will not happen.”

Good stuff.

This entry was posted in documentation, News and tagged , , .

Comments

  1. Of course DoD will give thumbs up… Open source is simply great way to rip off or to exploit whatever you need and don’t have time to do it yourself. That way instead of 10 programmers you have about few million at your direct or indirect disposal…

  2. Stephen K. says:

    Finally.
    Anybody that has worked in the DoD repair business understands what a pain it is to have to go to the sole source of a piece of equipment to a simple part. Case in point, I needed a small part for a radar system. The original manufacturer wanted over $2000 and 18 months lead time. I found a local shop that made it from scratch for under $500 and in a week. The ship was back in service on time.
    The Russians and now the Chinese have been using the US as “open source” for their technology for decades.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.