<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Prototype: USB infrared remote control receiver/transmitter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dangerousprototypes.com/2010/01/29/prototype-usb-infrared-remote-control-receivertransmitter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dangerousprototypes.com/2010/01/29/prototype-usb-infrared-remote-control-receivertransmitter/</link>
	<description>A new open source hardware project every month</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 00:21:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: prowest</title>
		<link>http://dangerousprototypes.com/2010/01/29/prototype-usb-infrared-remote-control-receivertransmitter/#comment-2785</link>
		<dc:creator>prowest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2010 12:41:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dangerousprototypes.com/?p=1335#comment-2785</guid>
		<description>thank you.
Thanks for posting the chart! Very informative article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thank you.<br />
Thanks for posting the chart! Very informative article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: realmeteo</title>
		<link>http://dangerousprototypes.com/2010/01/29/prototype-usb-infrared-remote-control-receivertransmitter/#comment-2075</link>
		<dc:creator>realmeteo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 07:31:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dangerousprototypes.com/?p=1335#comment-2075</guid>
		<description>Hi, I like to know if only RC5 is supported or if it is UNIVERSAL for all remote codes.
Thank you</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, I like to know if only RC5 is supported or if it is UNIVERSAL for all remote codes.<br />
Thank you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: infrarossi</title>
		<link>http://dangerousprototypes.com/2010/01/29/prototype-usb-infrared-remote-control-receivertransmitter/#comment-2073</link>
		<dc:creator>infrarossi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 07:11:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dangerousprototypes.com/?p=1335#comment-2073</guid>
		<description>Also I built a prototype of infrared remote RC5 to 8+1 relais receiver/interface.
Look on my website www.infrarossi.it to collaborate and improve it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also I built a prototype of infrared remote RC5 to 8+1 relais receiver/interface.<br />
Look on my website <a href="http://www.infrarossi.it" rel="nofollow">http://www.infrarossi.it</a> to collaborate and improve it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D4C5CE</title>
		<link>http://dangerousprototypes.com/2010/01/29/prototype-usb-infrared-remote-control-receivertransmitter/#comment-1805</link>
		<dc:creator>D4C5CE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2010 19:50:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dangerousprototypes.com/?p=1335#comment-1805</guid>
		<description>I second that; the possibilities are endless and take home automation to a whole new level while overcoming manufacturer/technology tie-ins to give everyone the best of all different brands of off-the-shelf hardware combined: http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1418809&amp;cid=29877939</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I second that; the possibilities are endless and take home automation to a whole new level while overcoming manufacturer/technology tie-ins to give everyone the best of all different brands of off-the-shelf hardware combined: <a href="http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1418809&amp;cid=29877939" rel="nofollow">http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1418809&amp;cid=29877939</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fux</title>
		<link>http://dangerousprototypes.com/2010/01/29/prototype-usb-infrared-remote-control-receivertransmitter/#comment-1800</link>
		<dc:creator>Fux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2010 15:48:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dangerousprototypes.com/?p=1335#comment-1800</guid>
		<description>A combined USB transceiver with IR and RF 433/868 MHz AM would be really very interesting.

Something like http://ethersex.de/index.php/BitfehlerASK for control power switches for example.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A combined USB transceiver with IR and RF 433/868 MHz AM would be really very interesting.</p>
<p>Something like <a href="http://ethersex.de/index.php/BitfehlerASK" rel="nofollow">http://ethersex.de/index.php/BitfehlerASK</a> for control power switches for example.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TEN</title>
		<link>http://dangerousprototypes.com/2010/01/29/prototype-usb-infrared-remote-control-receivertransmitter/#comment-1748</link>
		<dc:creator>TEN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 16:04:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dangerousprototypes.com/?p=1335#comment-1748</guid>
		<description>Could one also &quot;Setup TX modulation&quot; to use no modulation at all?

Would be pointless with &quot;nothing but IR&quot; of course, but RF transceivers (for which to be toggled by software instead of IR the PIC even has some leftover pins) could be driven by LIRC too, simply using the base-band TTL (as the 433&amp;868 MHz AM transceivers at just dollars apiece have their own internal oscillators), in order to end up with something like the http://mediola.com albeit in a much less expensive and more flexible way - and hence combine cheap RF-controlled sockets/dimmers/roller blinds motors etc. with IR gear, e.g. to set up the entire home cinema with just one button or even a &quot;Star Trek style&quot; voice command.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could one also &#8220;Setup TX modulation&#8221; to use no modulation at all?</p>
<p>Would be pointless with &#8220;nothing but IR&#8221; of course, but RF transceivers (for which to be toggled by software instead of IR the PIC even has some leftover pins) could be driven by LIRC too, simply using the base-band TTL (as the 433&amp;868 MHz AM transceivers at just dollars apiece have their own internal oscillators), in order to end up with something like the <a href="http://mediola.com" rel="nofollow">http://mediola.com</a> albeit in a much less expensive and more flexible way &#8211; and hence combine cheap RF-controlled sockets/dimmers/roller blinds motors etc. with IR gear, e.g. to set up the entire home cinema with just one button or even a &#8220;Star Trek style&#8221; voice command.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Willoughby</title>
		<link>http://dangerousprototypes.com/2010/01/29/prototype-usb-infrared-remote-control-receivertransmitter/#comment-1238</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Willoughby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 19:47:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dangerousprototypes.com/?p=1335#comment-1238</guid>
		<description>The EAGLE files are provided, so you could have circuit boards made on your own. Sunstone Circuits in Oregon would do this for $28 with free shipping, and if you order 4 or 5 the price drops to around $10 each. 20 gets you below $6 each. This is US only. Other places charge by the square inch. I believe there is a place in Australia with lower prices. Certainly China is cheaper.

I realize this might cost more than the kit, but if you&#039;re like me then there is a benefit besides price when you can use parts that you have. That&#039;s more environmental and saves the landfill from accumulating electronics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The EAGLE files are provided, so you could have circuit boards made on your own. Sunstone Circuits in Oregon would do this for $28 with free shipping, and if you order 4 or 5 the price drops to around $10 each. 20 gets you below $6 each. This is US only. Other places charge by the square inch. I believe there is a place in Australia with lower prices. Certainly China is cheaper.</p>
<p>I realize this might cost more than the kit, but if you&#8217;re like me then there is a benefit besides price when you can use parts that you have. That&#8217;s more environmental and saves the landfill from accumulating electronics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://dangerousprototypes.com/2010/01/29/prototype-usb-infrared-remote-control-receivertransmitter/#comment-1237</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 10:39:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dangerousprototypes.com/?p=1335#comment-1237</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the fantastic writeup Brian, that&#039;s a really great description of how to choose a substitute part.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the fantastic writeup Brian, that&#8217;s a really great description of how to choose a substitute part.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Willoughby</title>
		<link>http://dangerousprototypes.com/2010/01/29/prototype-usb-infrared-remote-control-receivertransmitter/#comment-1236</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Willoughby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 21:02:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dangerousprototypes.com/?p=1335#comment-1236</guid>
		<description>The most important value is the DO323, a.k.a. SOD-323. As Ian says, you can&#039;t easily squeeze a different shape onto the PCB.

What I always do is hit Mouser. Start with a search for BAS16HT1G, and when you click on the Mouser part #, you&#039;ll be given the opportunity to search for similar replacements. In this case, Mouser uses SOD-323 as the package / case. You can basically turn off the checkbox for everything else, because you don&#039;t care about brand or other overly specific values. In the results that appear after clicking &quot;Show Similar,&quot; I tend to sort by price and then start narrowing down the options. Mouser finds about 425 options that would fit the PCB.

The actual selection process can be a little tricky. I recommend keeping a browser window open on the original part, and then use it as a guide to narrow things down in the search results. For example, after selecting general purpose diodes in the search results, I see recovery times of 4 ns, 6 ns, and 50 ns.  Since the original part is 6 ns, I just select 4 ns and 6 ns to weed out the slower 50 ns diodes, just in case speed is important. Meanwhile, the lowest voltage is 70V and the smallest current is 150mA, so probably anything will do.  If you&#039;re concerned, then start specifying more values to narrow the results.

You&#039;ll note that there is a 1N4148 in SOD-323 as part of the results.

If you want to speed up the process, the Mouser part # page for the original part will update the number of similar parts Found as you check or uncheck different specifications, so you can quickly experiment with how precise you want the match.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The most important value is the DO323, a.k.a. SOD-323. As Ian says, you can&#8217;t easily squeeze a different shape onto the PCB.</p>
<p>What I always do is hit Mouser. Start with a search for BAS16HT1G, and when you click on the Mouser part #, you&#8217;ll be given the opportunity to search for similar replacements. In this case, Mouser uses SOD-323 as the package / case. You can basically turn off the checkbox for everything else, because you don&#8217;t care about brand or other overly specific values. In the results that appear after clicking &#8220;Show Similar,&#8221; I tend to sort by price and then start narrowing down the options. Mouser finds about 425 options that would fit the PCB.</p>
<p>The actual selection process can be a little tricky. I recommend keeping a browser window open on the original part, and then use it as a guide to narrow things down in the search results. For example, after selecting general purpose diodes in the search results, I see recovery times of 4 ns, 6 ns, and 50 ns.  Since the original part is 6 ns, I just select 4 ns and 6 ns to weed out the slower 50 ns diodes, just in case speed is important. Meanwhile, the lowest voltage is 70V and the smallest current is 150mA, so probably anything will do.  If you&#8217;re concerned, then start specifying more values to narrow the results.</p>
<p>You&#8217;ll note that there is a 1N4148 in SOD-323 as part of the results.</p>
<p>If you want to speed up the process, the Mouser part # page for the original part will update the number of similar parts Found as you check or uncheck different specifications, so you can quickly experiment with how precise you want the match.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://dangerousprototypes.com/2010/01/29/prototype-usb-infrared-remote-control-receivertransmitter/#comment-1235</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 18:39:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dangerousprototypes.com/?p=1335#comment-1235</guid>
		<description>Basically, anything similar to a 1n4148 will work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Basically, anything similar to a 1n4148 will work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
